People trying to reduce their ecological footprint still carry the burden of proof.
As if the fact that we can live as rich because others are in extreme poverty was ok after all.
As if there was no direct link between opulence here and deprivation there.
But we're all one hue?
I just don't get it.
On the one hand, the fear of being radical to much, on the other hand the necessity of being demanding. Hum...
Einstein quote of the day:
"Lorsque l'abeille disparaîtra, il restera à l'homme 4 ans à vivre"
x
